Relation between a process and a realizable entity

in BFO realizable is the parent of function, role and disposition. We should also have realization_of and has_realizable for consistency. Will the terminology get too confusing?

Examples

• reaction1 realizes
• function1
[""]

Other relations

This relation is the inverse of realized_by

id	OBO_REL_I:0000034
name	realizes
properties
aliases	executes [narrow] is_functioning_of [narrow] is_realization_of [narrow] realization_of [narrow]
anti_symmetric
holds_between	process and realizable_entity
reflexive
symmetric
transitive
all_some_in_reference_context
example	reaction1 realizes function1 [""]
inverse_of	realized_by
text_definition	Relation between a process and a realizable entity

Axioms for this relation:

Axioms that refer to this relation: